B Evidence Grade B Graded accuracy verified by the review judge Safe to Cite Recent

21%

21% -- click through rate lift for Plain text emails vs HTML/CSS styled emails (B2B email marketing) (2025)

2025  · Relate

In B2B email marketing, text-focused plain emails had a 21% higher click-through rate (CTR) compared to HTML/CSS styled emails.

  • Data presented in Relate webinar; detailed methodology, sample size, and study dates not specified in text.
Cite this stat Share How we verify
Attribution: Relate View source
Lighthouse Research Team
Last verified:  ·  How we verify data →
Source verified Evidence graded
Value
21%
Unit
Percentage
Data Vintage
2025
Entity
Plain text emails vs HTML/CSS styled emails (B2B email marketing)
B
Strong, reliable evidence

Sourced from a well-regarded research firm or industry leader with transparent methodology and a reasonably large sample.

61/100 confidence

Single source - not yet corroborated

Extraction
75
Source Trust
60
Citation Chain
20
Independence
30
Methodology
45
Freshness
95
Relate Primary Tier B
https://www.relate.kr/docs/topic/stibee-vs-mailchimp-vs-relate/ ↗
Confidence: 53/100 Vintage: 2025 Channel: Deep Crawl
Source Article
스티비 vs 메일침프 vs Relate 비교
이메일 마케팅 도구를 처음 도입하려는 B2B 팀이라면, 높은 확률로 세 가지 이름을 놓고 고민하게 됩니다. 한국에서 오랫동안 대표적인 뉴스레터 도구로 자리 잡은 스티비, 글로벌 시장 점유율 1위인 메일침프, 그리고 최근 B2B 팀 사이에서 빠르게 확산 중인 Spread(Relate). 셋 다 '이메일을 보내는 도구'지만, 설계 철학과 풀려는 문제가 근본적으로 다릅니다. 문제는 기능 목록만으로는 그 차이가 잘 보이지 않는다는 점입니다. 스타일리시한 뉴스레터를 만들 것인지, 리드를 미팅까지 끌어올 것인지에 따라 최적의 도구는 완전히 달…
Original Research
Relate · Original study ↗

Relative performance of text-focused plain emails vs HTML/CSS styled emails, as shared in Relate's 'B2B Email Marketing 101' webinar; the article does not specify whether the 21% is a relative lift or a percentage-point difference, nor the sample size or exact study period; article publication date not stated, so the latest year referenced (2025) is used.

Methodology documented
Industrymarketing
Plain Text
Plain text emails vs HTML/CSS styled emails (B2B email marketing): 21% click through rate lift. Source: Relate (2025). Via Lighthouse Intelligence -- https://lighthousedata.io/data/plain-text-email-ctr-lift-vs-html
HTML Embed
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/plain-text-email-ctr-lift-vs-html" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>21%</strong> -- click through rate lift for Plain text emails vs HTML/CSS styled emails (B2B email marketing)<br><small>Source: Relate (2025) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/plain-text-email-ctr-lift-vs-html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Intelligence</a></small></blockquote>
Share
Share on X Share on LinkedIn

Use this data in your work

Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics -- all free.

Copy citation Explore similar stats →