B Evidence Grade B Graded accuracy verified by the review judge Safe to Cite Dated

42%

42% -- brand value growth rate for Johnnie Walker (2009)

2009  · Millward Brown

Johnnie Walker's brand value increased by 42% year-on-year according to the 2009 Millward Brown BrandZ ranking.

Cite this stat Share How we verify
Attribution: Millward Brown View source
Lighthouse Research Team
Last verified:  ·  How we verify data →
Source verified Evidence graded
Value
42%
Unit
Percentage
Data Vintage
2009
Entity
Johnnie Walker
B
Strong, reliable evidence

Sourced from a well-regarded research firm or industry leader with transparent methodology and a reasonably large sample.

61/100 confidence

Single source - not yet corroborated

Extraction
75
Source Trust
60
Citation Chain
20
Independence
30
Methodology
45
Freshness
95
Millward Brown Primary Tier B
http://ronnie05.wordpress.com/2009/04/ ↗
Confidence: 53/100 Vintage: 2009 Channel: Common Crawl
Source Article
Posts from April 2009 on Ronnie05's Blog
Original Research
Millward Brown · Original study ↗

Year-on-year brand value growth per BrandZ ranking

Methodology documented
Industrymarketing
Plain Text
Johnnie Walker: 42% brand value growth rate. Source: Millward Brown (2009). Via Lighthouse Intelligence -- https://lighthousedata.io/data/johnnie-walker-brand-value-growth-42pct-2009
HTML Embed
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/johnnie-walker-brand-value-growth-42pct-2009" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>42%</strong> -- brand value growth rate for Johnnie Walker<br><small>Source: Millward Brown (2009) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/johnnie-walker-brand-value-growth-42pct-2009" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Intelligence</a></small></blockquote>
Share
Share on X Share on LinkedIn

Use this data in your work

Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics -- all free.

Copy citation Explore similar stats →