B Evidence Grade B Graded under review Safe to Cite Current

17%

17% -- cold email bounce rate for cold emails (2026)

2026  · Prospeo

Cite this stat Share How we verify
Attribution: Prospeo View source
Lighthouse Research Team
Last verified:  ·  How we verify data →
Source verified Evidence graded
Value
17%
Unit
Percentage
Data Vintage
2026
Entity
cold emails
B
Strong, reliable evidence

Sourced from a well-regarded research firm or industry leader with transparent methodology and a reasonably large sample.

60/100 confidence

Single source - not yet corroborated

Extraction
75
Source Trust
50
Citation Chain
60
Independence
30
Methodology
30
Freshness
95
Prospeo Primary Tier B
https://prospeo.io/s/i-hope-this-email-finds-you-well ↗
Confidence: 49/100 Vintage: 2026 Channel: Common Crawl
Source Article
"I Hope This Email Finds You Well" - Alternatives for 2026
"I Hope This Email Finds You Well" Is Costing You Replies - Here's What to Write Instead You've typed it. You've stared at it. You've deleted it, retyped it, and hit send anyway. Linguist Naomi Baron calls "I hope this email finds you well" the "cockroach of email openers - indestructible, omniprese…
Original Research
Prospeo · Original study ↗
Industrymarketing
Plain Text
cold emails: 17% cold email bounce rate. Source: Prospeo (2026). Via Lighthouse Intelligence -- https://lighthousedata.io/data/cold_email_bounce_rate
HTML Embed
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/cold_email_bounce_rate" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>17%</strong> -- cold email bounce rate for cold emails<br><small>Source: Prospeo (2026) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/cold_email_bounce_rate" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Intelligence</a></small></blockquote>
Share
Share on X Share on LinkedIn

Use this data in your work

Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics -- all free.

Copy citation Explore similar stats →