C
Evidence Grade C
Use with Hedging
Current
82
82 — 82% for (2026)
Source:
View source
Curated by Aaron Agius
· Founder, Louder Online
Last verified:
·
How we verify data →
Source verified
Evidence graded
Value
82
Unit
Count
Data Vintage
2026
Entity
Study Type
Unknown
Geography
RU
Trend
Stable
Evidence Quality
C
Moderate quality evidence
Useful directional data with some methodological gaps. Treat as indicative rather than definitive — corroborate before citing in formal research.
Score breakdown
Extraction
75
Source Trust
34
Citation Chain
90
Independence
30
Methodology
45
Freshness
95
Source
cossa.ru
Primary
Tier B
https://www.cossa.ru/news/347723/ ↗
Methodology
Multilingual extraction (lang=ru); original metric: 82%
Study: Unknown
Segmentation
Industrynull
Company SizeSMB
RegionRU
Rolenull
Channelnull
Cite this stat
Suggested hedging: According to limited, single-source data, based on claims without stated methodology, with unverified sample sizes...
Plain Text
: 82 82%. Source: cossa.ru (2026). Via Lighthouse Research Data — https://lighthousedata.io/data/82-2026
HTML Embed
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/82-2026" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>82</strong> — 82% for <br><small>Source: cossa.ru (2026) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/82-2026" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Data</a></small></blockquote>
Share
Related Statistics
Use this data in your work
Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics — all free.