C
Evidence Grade C
Use with Hedging
Recent
82
82 — 82% for 82%: Respondent organizations (2025)
Source:
View source
Curated by Aaron Agius
· Founder, Louder Online
Last verified:
·
How we verify data →
Source verified
Evidence graded
Value
82
Unit
Count
Data Vintage
2025
Entity
Study Type
Unknown
Trend
Stable
Evidence Quality
C
Moderate quality evidence
Useful directional data with some methodological gaps. Treat as indicative rather than definitive — corroborate before citing in formal research.
Score breakdown
Extraction
50
Source Trust
50
Citation Chain
90
Independence
30
Methodology
50
Freshness
95
Source
infoq.cn
Primary
Tier B
https://www.infoq.cn/article/C2WQHsZF6ruKr61USuSa?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=article ↗
Methodology
Multilingual extraction (lang=zh); original metric: 82%
Study: Unknown
Cite this stat
Suggested hedging: According to limited, single-source data, based on claims without stated methodology, with unverified sample sizes...
Plain Text
82%: Respondent organizations: 82 82%. Source: infoq.cn (2025). Via Lighthouse Research Data — https://lighthousedata.io/data/82-82-respondent-organizations-2025
HTML Embed
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/82-82-respondent-organizations-2025" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>82</strong> — 82% for 82%: Respondent organizations<br><small>Source: infoq.cn (2025) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/82-82-respondent-organizations-2025" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Data</a></small></blockquote>
Share
Related Statistics
Use this data in your work
Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics — all free.