B
Evidence Grade B
Graded
accuracy verified by the review judge
Safe to Cite
Current
40%
40% -- gross margin difference for Companies using per-seat pricing for AI products (2026)
Companies sticking with traditional per-seat pricing for AI products see 40% lower gross margins.
Attribution:
View source
Lighthouse Research Team
Last verified:
·
How we verify data →
Source verified
Evidence graded
Value
40%
Unit
Percentage
Data Vintage
2026
Entity
Evidence Quality
B
Strong, reliable evidence
Sourced from a well-regarded research firm or industry leader with transparent methodology and a reasonably large sample.
Single source - not yet corroborated
Score breakdown
Extraction
50
Source Trust
60
Citation Chain
20
Independence
30
Methodology
45
Freshness
95
Source
Pilot
Primary
Tier C
https://alhena.ai/blog/credit-based-ai-pricing-vendor-incentive-alignment/ ↗
Source Article
Why Credit-Based AI Pricing Aligns Vendor Incentives With Yours
Original Research
Pilot
· Original study ↗
Methodology
Cited from Pilot's 2026 AI economics research
Methodology documented
Segmentation
Industrymarketing
Cite this stat
Plain Text
Companies using per-seat pricing for AI products: 40% gross margin difference. Source: Pilot (2026). Via Lighthouse Intelligence -- https://lighthousedata.io/data/per-seat-ai-gross-margin-penalty
HTML Embed
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/per-seat-ai-gross-margin-penalty" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>40%</strong> -- gross margin difference for Companies using per-seat pricing for AI products<br><small>Source: Pilot (2026) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/per-seat-ai-gross-margin-penalty" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Intelligence</a></small></blockquote>
Share
Use this data in your work
Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics -- all free.