B Evidence Grade B Graded accuracy verified by the review judge Safe to Cite Current

91%

91% -- why context capture rate for conversational AI data (2026)

2026  · Alhena AI

Conversational data captures "why" context 91% of the time, compared to 37% for traditional surveys.

Cite this stat Share How we verify
Attribution: Alhena AI View source
Lighthouse Research Team
Last verified:  ·  How we verify data →
Source verified Evidence graded
Value
91%
Unit
Percentage
Data Vintage
2026
Entity
conversational AI data
B
Strong, reliable evidence

Sourced from a well-regarded research firm or industry leader with transparent methodology and a reasonably large sample.

61/100 confidence

Single source - not yet corroborated

Extraction
50
Source Trust
60
Citation Chain
20
Independence
30
Methodology
45
Freshness
95
Alhena AI Primary Tier C
https://alhena.ai/blog/ai-conversation-data-ecommerce-merchandising-gaps/ ↗
Confidence: 48/100 Vintage: 2026 Channel: Common Crawl
Source Article
What 1M AI Conversations Reveal About Merchandising Gaps
Original Research
Alhena AI · Original study ↗

Vendor claim, no named original study

Methodology documented
Industrymarketing
Plain Text
conversational AI data: 91% why context capture rate. Source: Alhena AI (2026). Via Lighthouse Intelligence -- https://lighthousedata.io/data/conversational-data-why-context-91
HTML Embed
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/conversational-data-why-context-91" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>91%</strong> -- why context capture rate for conversational AI data<br><small>Source: Alhena AI (2026) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/conversational-data-why-context-91" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Intelligence</a></small></blockquote>
Share
Share on X Share on LinkedIn

Use this data in your work

Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics -- all free.

Copy citation Explore similar stats →