B
Evidence Grade B
Graded
accuracy verified by the review judge
Safe to Cite
Current
13.2%
13.2% -- share of cited posts lacking capsule and insight for ChatGPT-cited blog posts (2026)
13.2% of ChatGPT-cited blog posts lacked both an answer capsule and proprietary insight.
Attribution:
View source
Lighthouse Research Team
Last verified:
·
How we verify data →
Source verified
Evidence graded
Value
13.2%
Unit
Percentage
Data Vintage
2026
Entity
Sample Size
2,000,000
Evidence Quality
B
Strong, reliable evidence
Sourced from a well-regarded research firm or industry leader with transparent methodology and a reasonably large sample.
Single source - not yet corroborated
Score breakdown
Extraction
75
Source Trust
60
Citation Chain
20
Independence
30
Methodology
45
Freshness
95
Source
akselera.tech
Primary
Tier B
https://akselera.tech/en/insights/guides/chatgpt-optimization-guide ↗
Source Article
ChatGPT Optimization 2026: Get Cited & Recommended
Original Research
akselera.tech
· Original study ↗
Methodology
Analysis of nearly 2 million sessions
Methodology documented
Segmentation
IndustryMedia
RoleContent Marketer
Channelcontent
Cite this stat
Plain Text
ChatGPT-cited blog posts: 13.2% share of cited posts lacking capsule and insight. Source: akselera.tech (2026). Via Lighthouse Intelligence -- https://lighthousedata.io/data/cited-posts-lacking-both-13-2
HTML Embed
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/cited-posts-lacking-both-13-2" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>13.2%</strong> -- share of cited posts lacking capsule and insight for ChatGPT-cited blog posts<br><small>Source: akselera.tech (2026) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/cited-posts-lacking-both-13-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Intelligence</a></small></blockquote>
Share
Use this data in your work
Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics -- all free.