B
Evidence Grade B
Graded
under review
Safe to Cite
Current
95%
95% -- false positive rate for AML compliance teams (2026)
Attribution:
View source
Lighthouse Research Team
Last verified:
·
How we verify data →
Source verified
Evidence graded
Value
95%
Unit
Percentage
Data Vintage
2026
Entity
Evidence Quality
B
Strong, reliable evidence
Sourced from a well-regarded research firm or industry leader with transparent methodology and a reasonably large sample.
Single source - not yet corroborated
Score breakdown
Extraction
50
Source Trust
60
Citation Chain
20
Independence
30
Methodology
45
Freshness
95
Source
amlwatcher.com
Primary
Tier C
https://amlwatcher.com/blog/agentic-ai-in-aml/ ↗
Source Article
A New Era of Compliance and Detection with Agentic AI in AML
Original Research
amlwatcher.com
· Original study ↗
Methodology
Cited as 'according to media reports'; secondary source
Methodology documented
Segmentation
Industrymarketing
Cite this stat
Plain Text
AML compliance teams: 95% false positive rate. Source: amlwatcher.com (2026). Via Lighthouse Intelligence -- https://lighthousedata.io/data/aml-false-positive-rate-95
HTML Embed
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/aml-false-positive-rate-95" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>95%</strong> -- false positive rate for AML compliance teams<br><small>Source: amlwatcher.com (2026) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/aml-false-positive-rate-95" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Intelligence</a></small></blockquote>
Share
Related Statistics
Use this data in your work
Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics -- all free.