B Evidence Grade B Graded accuracy verified by the review judge Safe to Cite Recent

37%

37% -- relative reactivation rate lift for AI-targeted dormant member groups vs. control groups receiving only traditional outreach (AviaryAI deployments) (2025)

2025  · AviaryAI

Across deployments, AI-targeted groups show 37% higher reactivation rates than control groups receiving only traditional outreach.

  • Absolute baseline reactivation rate not disclosed
  • Based on A/B tests across AviaryAI live deployments
Cite this stat Share How we verify
Attribution: AviaryAI View source
Lighthouse Research Team
Last verified:  ·  How we verify data →
Source verified Evidence graded
Value
37%
Unit
Percentage
Data Vintage
2025
Entity
AI-targeted dormant member groups vs. control groups receiving only traditional outreach (AviaryAI deployments)
B
Strong, reliable evidence

Sourced from a well-regarded research firm or industry leader with transparent methodology and a reasonably large sample.

61/100 confidence

Single source - not yet corroborated

Extraction
75
Source Trust
60
Citation Chain
20
Independence
30
Methodology
35
Freshness
95
AviaryAI Primary Tier B
https://www.helloaviary.ai/dormancy ↗
Confidence: 52/100 Vintage: 2025 Channel: Deep Crawl
Source Article
Credit Union Dormant Account Reactivation — Case Study
Case Study: How Credit Unions Are Reactivating Thousands of Dormant Accounts Most dormant members haven't left — they've just gone quiet. These credit unions launched an AI voice agent that reaches them first, educates them, and brings them back. AUM: $6B+ Members: 360k+ AUM: $2.15B Members: 57k+ AU…
Original Research
AviaryAI · Original study ↗

Page undated; year estimated from crawl. Relative lift from A/B tests against control groups across deployments; absolute baseline reactivation rate not disclosed.

Methodology documented
Industrymarketing
Plain Text
AI-targeted dormant member groups vs. control groups receiving only traditional outreach (AviaryAI deployments): 37% relative reactivation rate lift. Source: AviaryAI (2025). Via Lighthouse Intelligence -- https://lighthousedata.io/data/ai-reactivation-lift-vs-traditional
HTML Embed
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/ai-reactivation-lift-vs-traditional" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>37%</strong> -- relative reactivation rate lift for AI-targeted dormant member groups vs. control groups receiving only traditional outreach (AviaryAI deployments)<br><small>Source: AviaryAI (2025) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/ai-reactivation-lift-vs-traditional" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Intelligence</a></small></blockquote>
Share
Share on X Share on LinkedIn

Use this data in your work

Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics -- all free.

Copy citation Explore similar stats →