C
Evidence Grade C
Use with Hedging
Current
9.7%
9.7% — hallucination rate for MedGemma (2026)
Source:
View source
Curated by Aaron Agius
· Founder, Louder Online
Last verified:
·
How we verify data →
Source verified
Evidence graded
Value
9.7%
Unit
Percentage
Data Vintage
2026
Entity
Study Type
Unknown
Trend
Stable
Evidence Quality
C
Moderate quality evidence
Useful directional data with some methodological gaps. Treat as indicative rather than definitive — corroborate before citing in formal research.
Source
bing.com
Primary
Tier A
http://www.bing.com/news/apiclick.aspx?ref=FexRss&aid=&tid=69cea1601e1a450ca2163ec955670648&url=http… ↗
Original Research
숨빗AI
· Original study ↗
Methodology
Comparison with AIRead-CXR
Study: Unknown
Cite this stat
Suggested hedging: based on claims without stated methodology, with unverified sample sizes...
Plain Text
MedGemma: 9.7% hallucination rate. Source: bing.com (2026). Via Lighthouse Research Data — https://lighthousedata.io/data/medgemma-hallucination-rate
HTML Embed
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/medgemma-hallucination-rate" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>9.7%</strong> — hallucination rate for MedGemma<br><small>Source: bing.com (2026) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/medgemma-hallucination-rate" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Data</a></small></blockquote>
Share
Related Statistics
Use this data in your work
Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics — all free.