B
Evidence Grade B
Graded
under review
Safe to Cite
Current
58%
58% -- share of journalists citing irrelevant pitch as rejection reason for app review journalists (2026)
Attribution:
View source
Lighthouse Research Team
Last verified:
·
How we verify data →
Source verified
Evidence graded
Value
58%
Unit
Percentage
Data Vintage
2026
Entity
Sample Size
69
Evidence Quality
B
Strong, reliable evidence
Sourced from a well-regarded research firm or industry leader with transparent methodology and a reasonably large sample.
Single source - not yet corroborated
Score breakdown
Extraction
75
Source Trust
60
Citation Chain
20
Independence
30
Methodology
45
Freshness
95
Source
Big Games Machine
Primary
Tier B
https://www.biggamesmachine.com/69-app-reviewers-reveal-exactly-why-they-accept-and-reject-apps/ ↗
Source Article
69 app reviewers reveal why they accept and reject apps
Original Research
Big Games Machine
· Original study ↗
Methodology
Survey of 69 app reviewers
Methodology documented
Segmentation
Industrymarketing
Cite this stat
Plain Text
app review journalists: 58% share of journalists citing irrelevant pitch as rejection reason. Source: Big Games Machine (2026). Via Lighthouse Intelligence -- https://lighthousedata.io/data/irrelevant-pitch-rejection-58
HTML Embed
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/irrelevant-pitch-rejection-58" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>58%</strong> -- share of journalists citing irrelevant pitch as rejection reason for app review journalists<br><small>Source: Big Games Machine (2026) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/irrelevant-pitch-rejection-58" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Intelligence</a></small></blockquote>
Share
Use this data in your work
Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics -- all free.